With COVID-19 circulating throughout the world, prominent journalists/show hosts have had a variety of interesting viewpoints. Beyond the typical hysteria of the mainstream news and that of the government agencies, some assert that Covid-19 represents something else entirely.
Alex Jones, of Infowars.com, asserts that COVID-19 is more than likely a man-made bio weapon emanating out of a Chinese laboratory in Wuhan, funded by Bill Gates and potentially other “globalists” for various nefarious purposes designed to deepen their clutches on the globe. He cites purported claims that Bill Gates was funding research into similar types of biological agents and that the results were transferred to a biological warfare lab in Wuhan, which either got out accidentally or were purposely let out into China to be then spread throughout the world. While these theories may be entirely false (many leading experts around the world assert that the virus was most likely spread from the consumption of wild animals that carry this virus, bought from certain markets in China), Alex Jones is not alone in his viewpoint. Speaking on his show multiple times recently, law professor and Harvard graduate, Francis Boyle, is adamant that the virus is a form of biological warfare because it appears to contain additional components reminiscent of certain qualities of HIV. While not claiming that it contains HIV itself, he suggests that the science shows that it may have been tampered with to contain attributes similar to what HIV uses to be such a destructive agent. He cites scientific research into the virus that suggests these findings. While Francis Boyle is a law expert and not necessarily an epidemiology expert, he has done in-depth work trying to change the politics of biological warfare research; he claims to have drafted the first ever multilateral anti-biological warfare research act to try to shut down the furtherance of research into the creation of biological warfare agents.
Along with this viewpoint, Alex Jones also feels that the media is hyping the seriousness of COVID-19 in order to push for a US and potentially global financial downturn to offset the positive, growth-oriented, effect of President Trump. This is a nuanced viewpoint because while Alex feels that COVID-19 may be a bio-weapon, he points out that it is significantly more contagious than it is deadly and that the media is acting as an arm of the globalists to hype the hysteria and create an eventual recession or depression. Interestingly, some admitted globalists like Gordon Brown are citing the crisis as a reason to create a temporary global government with enforcement powers to handle the global pandemic effectively. To Alex Jones’ credit, he has suggested for years that the globalist establishment that longs for world government under their rule would use various potential crises as reasons to instill greater global cooperation and top down control.
Some within the conspiracy crowd hold a slightly different viewpoint about COVID-19, however. Author and Lecturer David Wilcock claims to have high level sources that tell him that COVID-19, though it seems to them to have been funded and created by globalists like Bill Gates, will be used as a cover by international high-level patriots to arrest various high-level globalists that they have proven to be involved in highly destructive actions toward the general public. Wilcock claims that there will be 3 days of “darkness” in which case the public will not be able to use a phone beyond emergency numbers and most, if not all, of the internet will be down. This, he says, is so that the patriots can “cut the cord” of various internet communication systems used by the destructive globalists that he refers to as “the cabal”. He claims that this will likely occur but that he does not know when exactly. He only suggests that it will be during this pandemic debacle. When their underground communication ability is lost and removed from the internet, the internet can be restored for the public. While Wilcock acknowledges that he is broadcasting the plan, in effect, to the cabal and that they might try to learn and deflect it, he claims the patriot alliance is confident that there is nowhere for them to run anyway and that the operation will occur regardless of whether they try to plan against it.
Interestingly, David Wilcock also highlights an interesting phenomenon that many people in the Q Anon community have brought up. Recently, the news media has reported that President Trump, due to the pandemic, took actions to nationalize aspects of certain financial markets. Apparently, this, in effect, placed the treasury atop the federal reserve in certain respects when the federal reserve normally prides itself on being totally separate from government. One article even joked sarcastically that Donald Trump is now, in effect, the new chairman of the Federal Reserve. Those that follow the phenomenon of breadcrumb-dropping Q Anon, which is a supposedly high level Trump insider or group of insiders that is part of a patriot community set on taking down the deep state/globalist cabal, point to a “breadcrumb” left by Q on a forum after being asked whether Trump/the patriots were going to end The Federal Reserve (which they feel is a centralized hub of financial control over the US by the globalists). Q responded with the word “Structure”. David Wilcock, who is a follower of Q Anon and claims to have high level sources of his own to validate the concept of Q, feels that this move toward the financial markets by Trump is a chess move to regain control over the Federal Reserve by the Treasury and, through that, the people.
Infowars.com radio show host Alex Jones also feels that this move to nationalize aspects of the financial market is a powerful chess move toward the freedom of American finances by having the United States Treasury take up a stronger role in the decisions that the Federal Reserve normally dictates unilaterally with very little, if any, oversight. However, he disagrees with David Wilcock and followers of Q Anon in their belief that Q still represents truth. Alex Jones claims to know the people that actually started Q and that while the intention was good, it got overtaken by others and cannot be trusted with a hypnotic sense of allegiance that he feels some have succumbed to. On a recent broadcast of his show, he gave the creators of Q one week to come forward with the truth and come on his show or he would let it out. Alex Jones might be fueled to go forward with this because Q has apparently spoken badly about Infowars before and given the idea that they are controlled opposition not to be trusted. Alex feels this shows that Q, at least at times, has been taken over by disinformation agents.
A colleague of David Wilcock, Benjamin Fullford, also claims to have high-level sources involved in this fight for humanity. Fullford used to be an economics writer for Forbes stationed in Asia and claims to have been nearly simultaneously threatened and offered protection by competing groups after exposing corruption in Asia. The group he was threatened by, he claims, was associated with the cabal of globalists that want to control and enslave the planet. They offered him the option of stopping his opposition and joining them, essentially. The group he claims offered him protection, he says, came the day after he was threatened and is an Asian secret society that opposes the cabal’s goal of reducing the world’s population dramatically and imposing control over the planet. Fulford chose protection and he alludes that he has since had high-level sources in this secret society and elsewhere who look to him as an outlet for disseminating information about global events to the general public.
Fulford, like Wilcock, makes bold claims about current and yet to be future events. He claims that the “cabal” is hoarding trillions of dollars worth of gold that the secret society and alliance of patriots from various countries wish to use for the betterment of the planet and its people. While this may seem whimsical, on one level, if it was true that there was such a high level of gold to be available for the public to raise their standard of living, it could be said that globalist environmentalists would not want that and would rather keep it hidden because they seem to view wealth and population as factors that, unless kept in check, could continue to deplete natural resources and weaken political order and stability. Various globalist/environmentalist think tanks write about how both population and the level of wealth used by that population is tied to their level of exploitation of the planet. Therefore, they suggest that a global flatline of growth in both of these areas are needed to preserve the health of the planet. Fulford says that the groups he is working with that feed him information are countering this goal. While preserving the earth may sound noble and that, by itself, is a worthy goal, Fulford claims that the end goal of these non-patriotic globalists is to reduce global population by a large amount and hoard money and resources for themselves, leaving the rest of humanity to die or be serfs. In his view, either the planet-saving ideology is a cover for global depopulation and control or they are so extreme and nazi-like in their ideology for saving the planet that they literally view most of humanity as useless consumers. Either way, to him, the result of their leadership is disastrous for the general public.
On more mainstream news sources, Bill Gates has been sharing his perspective on handling the COVID-19 crisis most effectively. While he does stand in agreement with many about staying indoors to limit viral exposure and keep the pandemic from spreading as much, he also is very adamant about the importance of a global COVID-19 vaccine that he and his associates are funding and developing which he suggests will help the situation greatly. Critics of this concept suggest that he is simply seeking to profit either monetarily or politically/philosophically by using the crisis to instill a sense of urgency to get the entire planet on board for new vaccinations that he or others would be behind. Conspiracy theorists and those suspicious of the safety of vaccines suggest that this vaccine could create more problems than it helps. They cite numerous cases of children and adults being badly injured or dying as a result of taking certain vaccines. Recently, the leading vaccine experts from around the world met at a World Health Organization meeting titled the Vaccine Safety Summit in Switzerland. Video clips that did not at all look to be taken out of context show many of these experts citing actual risks and problems with vaccines that are causing doctors around the world to not trust them. A common view among them acknowledging these risks seems to be that a primary area of concern is the adjuvants like aluminum that are added to vaccines to, in essence, create a bigger immune reaction and allow the vaccine to work. One expert suggests that when he teaches how to create vaccines, he tells them that you want to avoid using adjuvants at all costs when possible but that sometimes adjuvants are necessary to make the vaccine effective. Another expert suggested there is a lack of appropriate studies into the safety of vaccines and therefore it is hard to make a convincing argument to doctors who question vaccine safety when their patients die or have a bad reaction. Throughout the meeting, it is clear that these experts acknowledge that enough people die or get injured from vaccines to be considered an actual problem that needs more research so that they are better equipped to handle pushback from doctors who become disillusioned after their patients are harmed. So to the concept that global vaccines are the answer, some might look at the phrase “one man’s trash is another man’s treasure” and change it to “one man's cure is another man's poison.”